World leaders have attacked President Joe Biden for his ill-considered speech in Poland over the weekend in which he seemed to argue for regime change when he called Russian President Vladimir Putin a “butcher” and said, “For God’s sake, this man cannot remain in power.”
Republicans attacked him. Heck, even some in the establishment media attacked him, friendly though they may be.
Now, his own White House is attacking him, too — if perhaps unintentionally.
On Tuesday, White House Chief of Staff Ron Klain retweeted remarks from CNN’s John Harwood remarks about the president’s speech.
take our poll – story continues below
Should Dr. Fauci be fired?
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
While the tone of Harwood’s tweet was generally complimentary, he said “Biden’s last-line ad-lib about Putin represented a significant lapse in discipline.
(As The Western Journal has documented, this isn’t the first time Klain’s Twitter account has gotten himself and the White House into trouble. We’ll continue to point out the White House chief of staff’s telling social media gaffes. You can help us by subscribing.)
Harwood’s tweet went thusly: “Biden’s last-line ad-lib about Putin represented a significant lapse in discipline but on concrete military steps, he has remained careful to avoid escalation risks experts on nuclear doctrine say he’s right to do so.”
Biden’s last-line ad-lib about Putin represented a significant lapse in discipline
but on concrete military steps, he has remained careful to avoid escalation risks
experts on nuclear doctrine say he’s right to do so
my @CNN analysis
https://t.co/IftdM4YuKa— John Harwood (@JohnJHarwood) March 27, 2022
His analysis of Biden’s speech was what you’d expect from a CNNite; consider that it includes a quote from NeverTrump hack Tom Nichols that identifies him only as “a leading authority on Russia and US nuclear doctrine.”
Was Biden’s speech in Poland a ‘significant lapse in discipline’?
Yes: 0% (0 Votes)
No: 0% (0 Votes)
<
